so sad: Alabama current head coach just announced on social medial that he be……

so sad: Alabama current head coach just announced on social medial that he be……

On Friday, organizations advocating for physicians and hospitals in Alabama urged the state Supreme Court to reexamine a ruling that equated frozen embryos to children. They claimed the decision was impeding fertility treatments and negatively affecting the medical community. In the case that has garnered international attention, the Alabama Hospital Association and the Medical Association of the State of Alabama filed a brief in support of a request for a rehearing. Although such requests are rarely granted by courts, the organizations contended that the ruling is having far-reaching effects as IVF clinics are pausing their services. They added that it is casting a shadow of doubt over the medical community. The ruling of this court will prevent a great number of would-be parents from becoming parents. There is a tragedy throughout Alabama, attorneys for

Nick Saban: A look at the Alabama Crimson Tide football head coach

The ruling of this court will prevent a great number of would-be parents from becoming parents. This is a tragedy that affects all of Alabama, attorneys representing the groups wrote. Three couples whose frozen embryos were destroyed in an accident at a storage facility are now able to file wrongful death lawsuits for their “extrauterine children,” according to an Alabama court ruling last month. Concerns concerning clinic civil liabilities were raised by the decision, which applied the state’s wrongful death law to the embryos in the same way as it would to a child or a gestating fetus. The Center for Reproductive Medicine and the Mobile Infirmary, the lawsuits’ defendants, submitted a request for a rehearing to the court on Friday.

The providers’ attorneys contended that the decision is in conflict with other state statutes. The state’s abortion prohibition and fetal homicide statutes were designed to protect fetuses and embryos “in utero,” or within the uterus. In addition, they mentioned that Alabama legislators are trying to revive IVF by suggesting that clinics be protected from lawsuits. They stated in their report that “our Legislature’s rushed reaction to try to address the issues created by the Court’s opinion would seem to indicate the Legislature’s intent is not what this Court presumed.” The IVF procedures the plaintiffs in this case underwent produced multiple embryos, some of which were implanted and produced healthy offspring. Couples paid to maintain others’ frozen state at the

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*